Thia Q&A
Thia Q&A
Please feel free to comment with any questions you have! I'll continue answering and adding them to the main post.
Q: Did Thia know she was lesbian before she was in the wreck?
A: If you're asking about It, then being a lesbian is purely coincidental. It has never been concerned with form; It's 'orientation' is merely the byproduct of It's current vessel and Amy's current vessel, whatever those may be.
Q: What happened to Aiden? Why did he never show up again after so much character development?
A: Sometimes people lose contact. Sometimes connections from youth don't last into adulthood. Sometimes people never find their place in life. Sometimes it's too hard to bear everything alone. As for why Aiden never reappeared... let's leave that as an exercise to the reader's imagination.
Q: Why was the peanut gallery was even allowed to attend the wedding?
A: Lulu is never one to reject a profitable venture. Since It gave no restrictions to Lulu regarding the details of the wedding (other than inviting It's list of guests, and hosting the wedding within 5 mortal years), Lulu made returns by monetizing attendance, as seen in ch40.
🖤███ : "Dearest Writer, might I just say that I am made positively aghast by the insinuations wrought by such an accusation in a public forum."
A: "..."
🖤███ : "Not that you'd be wrong, of course. Just that I am made aghast, and that I fear my future business with this particular cohort of Readers might face a marked reduction. That is all.
🖤███ : "But please note, Reader, that I do, in fact, follow contracts to the letter. Let one be reminded that as a grand courtesy from yours truly, I did confirm that Retribution wanted me to have full rights to all unspecified details of the wedding. I maintain that I am blameless in this affair. If you're in need of any services—"
Comment highlight from Chapter 6:
At this point, I am kind of wondering if at some point It goes back in time and becomes Thia until her death for some reason, and that was why Dad and Amy still see It as being somewhat similar to Thia, but different because at the point It became Thia in the past, It had already learned more from them.
That would be a bit of a Paradox since It would only have gone back to become the original Thia because It was summoned in an attempt to bring the original Thia back, but that would be nothing new for Eldritch beings.
A: Really clever guess! That's not exactly what happened, but I'm amazed that you already had such ideas in mind all the way from chapter 6. Cookie for you.
Q: Why does It have dots before speaking?
A: I'd like to refer you back to chapter 28. Amy more or less describes what effect the dots are supposed to have. When It has moments of hesitation, those moments are measured to the dot, so to say.
Q: Why are some words randomly capitalized?
A: Words of Power are capitalized to represent their weight vs. regular prose. Basically only beings of Divinity do this.
Amy has done this once or twice in the story, whether she knew it or not.
Q: How could Dad and Amy accept Thia so easily?
A: 1) You'll see from the chapters featuring Thia that she is very much neurodivergent, and that she and It share a lot of mannerisms and speaking habits.
2) Did they?
Q: Which god is [insert symbol here]
A: I have my own ideas in mind for each of the beings of Divinity featured in the story and who they represent. But I think it's more interesting if the reader fills in the blanks with their own interpretations from the mythos that they know.
Q: You have a typo on chapter 51: "wont to reply"
A: Not a typo, just an older phrase that has fallen out of favour. You'll often encounter "wont" in the phrase "wont to do" or "wont to be" when talking about habits or behaviours that one is accustomed to.
"Waking up before dawn was not something that the pampered prince was wont to do."
"She slept through the morning summons, as was the princess' wont."
Q: Will you be stubbing Thia?
A: Never. The eBook is already out on Patreon, and I'll release it on Amazon once all the legal details (read: ISBN) are settled. But I'll never stub Thia or any future novels. The web versions will be less edited, though, as it's a pain to bulk update.
Q: How old were It's and Amy's mortal bodies by the time the novel ends?
A: Approximately in their 50s/60s depending on how old you think Thia was at the start of the novel.
Q: How long have they been married at the end?
A: Approximately 20 years.
Q: How does It feel about crows?
A: It has no particular feeling towards crows.
Q: In this logic, is psychology Divine?
A: Incorrect. It posits: psychology brings a great many Benefits to the recipient of treatment but comes at an equivalent cost to the provider of treatment. Overall: the Price and Ask of psychology are Just.
Q: What would an argument between Thia and Amy be like? And what would it be about?
A: There have been a couple arguments within the story. Notably, chapter 34 and chapter 60. In general, arguments stem from when It's lack of mortal common sense meets Amy's lack of Divine common sense.
Q: Will future stories you write be connected to this one?
A: The Lulu pre/sequel will be connected. I have some plans to do a series of stories for several of the other major Concepts/Elders. The next story I have in the pipeline, The Language of Whimsy, is not related. (Though it will still feature It when there is a major Arbitration).
Q: Does Amy take part in the (chapter 79) bingo and how does It feel about the game? Additionally, since the bingo is yearly, how long have they been playing?
A: Amy does take part in the bingo! She's gotten close to winning once. Darcy is just too lucky.
"It has no particular feelings about the game. It is perplexed why so many bingo points are related to It."
Q: Any stand out performances in the bingo? (other than Amy... I know she'll win if she plays)
A: "Hah... I've never won. I'm pretty sure the entire universe is rigged to make Darcy win against all cosmic odds. First off: a 40% win rate is illegal. Second: how is it possible that she rolled a chart with 'Thia trips up the stairs on video', 'Hayley doesn't cry watching Air Bud', 'Gabe reads before replying', and 'YOLO mentioned on live news'... and still managed to win? Is she one of Thia's god friends or something?"
Q: How often did It talk in that group chat? Must've been more frequent than shown, unless Amy was keeping everyone up to date?
A: It reads every message written in the group chat. It occasionally adds commentary when It is called for. It often feeds the group chat dog food or cat food upon request.
Q: How many books did Amy write? Of the many career options (chapter 21) how many did she try?
A: Poet and writer: okay, I think.
Comedian: bomb.
Rapper: let's not talk about it.
Song writer: a few times! Hah... too embarrassed to sing them, though.
Playwright: just once, upon request. Not something I'd do without prompting, but it was a nice experience. Very different from novels and poetry.
Dinosaur: once for Halloween. It was cute! I even got Thia to dress up as dilophosaurus. So frilly. Much cute.
Q: What will become of Mrrrau? Did/will It also bind their soul?
A: It will not bind Mrrrau's soul to the afterlife. Mrrrau would be Harmed by an Eternity of near-solitude in Mrrrau's current state as cat. It does not wish to Harm Mrrrau.
Q: Did the original Thia have feelings for Amy ? If so how does Thia feels about the relationship between It and Amy?
A: Original Thia was childhood best friends with Amy.
"I posit: platonic love is the ultimate form of love. I provide evidence: a lot of friendships can last a lifetime; most romantic relationships end in less than a year. I extrapolate: a platonic relationship is the most important base for any relationship. I provide evidence: Mom and Dad. I provide further evidence: It and Amy."
"It's a little freaky seeing It (who looks like me) and Amy romancing, though."
Q: Did they… uh… you know… do the thing? The thing even beyond handholding? 😳
A: They did, in fact, write hand-written letters to each other 
...
(But also, chapter 78 has some implications and some scenes-not-pictured)
Q: Every time It Arbitrates things, does It just teleport like that one time It teleported to the afterlife while Amy watched and literally disappeared? Or does It just do things with It's mind or other parts of It's Self that aren't bound to It's physical form?
A: From chapter 58:
It currently has limited omnipresence because It is bound to the mortal plane by the Terms of It’s summoner. Thus, It only responds to Terms which directly call for It, or Terms set within the realms and Domains of the Divine which It can access remotely.
For the majority of the story, It was operating at a very reduced scale and capacity. In general, as a Concept, It is omnipresent and without form (unless necessary). Similar to how Time is omnipresent, as far as mortals know.
Q: How much does It differ from a normal human? It can't get sick, but are there other strange features of It's mortal form?
A: It cannot cry; It's breaths, blinks, and heart rate are perfectly even; and It has comparatively less wrinkles compared to most people It's age due to It's perpetual neutral expression.
Q: TLDR: Why/how did it even ever fall in love with Amy? Did it ever fall in love in previous summons? On top of that, is there any main reason behind It falling in love with Amy beyond It just arbitrarily falling in love with Amy?
A: The premise is a little bit arbitrary, but essentially it boils down to: Amy embodies Divinity, gives Overall Benefit to It, has elevated It's existence, and has made countless Terms with It without ever reneging... which is something that hasn't happened since Time immemorial. To clarify the lore sprinkled through the story at random points, It's status is the Concept of Arbitration. Essentially, It is the force that binds Terms and enforces their adherence. Most of the Divine beings we've met are either respectful or horrified of It. Most mortals don't know of, and can't comprehend It's existence. Which leaves us with a very infinitesimally small window of opportunity for anything to interact with It in a deeper way than as a tool for enforcing a Term of pure neutrality. Among those, few would think to bind It to the mortal plane. Among those, even fewer would offer a Price great enough for It to accept. Among those, even fewer would think to freely give Overall Benefit to It. Among those, even fewer would continue making Term after non-essential Term to create a deeper connection with It. And among those, even fewer would seek to have a loving relationship with It and to help It grow as a 'person'. So essentially, despite existing since the Dawn of Time, It's experiences were limited exclusively to fulfilling It's Task as a Concept, and (as per the prologue) It never truly had a sense of Self, nor had It chosen anything based on It's own Wants, nor had such thoughts ever had a reason to cross It's mind. It was simply a sapient Concept that fulfilled It's role and nothing else. Only after receiving Overall Benefit and developing a sense of Self did It start to change after an Eternity of stasis. Then, in pursuit of elevating It's Divinity to the highest highs (as all beings of this level strive for), It inadvertently found love with Amy.
Q: Why does Amy keep calling It Thia? Wasn't It very confused by that?
A: "Oops. Sorry, Thia. I guess it's kind of just become a habit at this point. Would you prefer it if I called you It?"
"It is not bothered by what others call It. Amy can call It whatever Amy wishes."
"Okay, how about 'Super Cutiepoo Maximus'."
"Super Cutiepoo Maximus accepts."
Q: When It left at the end of 64, did It's body physically vanish?
A: Yes.
Q: Was chapter 66 a flashback, or was Amy trying to talk to a temporarily It-less Thia? On reread I'm pretty sure it was all flashbacks to the early conversations about It's imperfect imitation of Thia.
A: Your reread senses were correct! Those scenes were indeed flashbacks from around the time of chapters 1-3. I tried to make the moment as clear as reasonably possible (under the confines of It being the one Observed) by the single line "Reflection" followed by the time break, and then a direct recall of the "factory reset" and "hospital checkup" conversations from chapters 1-3. But chapter 66 very much does rely on either 63 chapters of memory, or a re-read. Sorry about that. Glad you caught it, though!
Q: Is there a limit in the scale and scope of It's arbitration?
A: Only that the Arbitration be between two or more beings capable of communication in any form.
Q: Did It for instance, arbitrate the interaction of the universe's fundamental forces upon their beginning, in turn determining the specifics of the natural laws emergent from their coexistence?
A: No. It arose as a Concept upon the first Arbitration between two beings. The Dawn of Creation was before It's Time. The one responsible for said event might or might not show up in future novels of the Thiaverse.
Q: What about in realms where such things are the manifestations of interactions of beings of Divinity?
A: Yes. It can Arbitrate the interactions within realms and Domains upon request, as long as a) no Law is violated in the process; and b) an appropriate Price is paid.
Q: If in a simulated world a computer is constantly determining the result of interactions between variables, would It be then the equivalent of the universe's hardware?
A: No. That role falls to the Concepts of Yes and No. It is responsible for Arbitration between beings.
Q: In an infinite multiverse, would there not be worlds defined by being beyond the reach of IT, beyond arbitration?
A: No. It arises as a Concept whenever a Term requires Arbitration in any plane, realm, or Domain (real, simulated, or imagined). That fragmented Concept, however, might not be part of the unified form that we know as It.
Q: Regarding foods, what would Thia's and Chef's opinion be on:
- Preferred forms of pasta.
A: "It grants Clarity."
Thia: "I like any noodle where the sauce coats everything evenly. Lasagna is good. Alfredo is good. Spag bol is okay, but when you mix it up, all the bol falls to the bottom, leaving just spag and tomato sauce. And a lot of bol at the bottom of your bowl-plate thing at the end."
Chef: "If I go to an Italian restaurant, the only two things I'll order on the first visit are the carbonara and margherita. If the fundamentals aren't there, nothing else is worth trying."
- Favorite: self made meal, family made meal, restaurant meal.
Thia: "I like anything that tastes good and feels good. I like anything made by mom or dad. Except that one time they tried making okra. The Indian restaurant cooks okra better. Except when they overcook it and turn it into slimy mush. I posit: if it's not crunchy, the restaurant should give me a refund. Or rather: give dad a refund."
Chef: "Self made? Anything fast and easy unless I'm trying something new. Soups and stir-fry are good for that. Maybe a Spanish omelette. For family made... my mom used to make this killer shepherd's pie. Even with the exact recipe, I can't make it like she did. Moms, right? As for restaurants... I don't even think I could tell you what the dish was, but some of those molecular gastronomy places where they do food science... That's real art, there. I mean, sometimes they go too far the wrong way and make pretentious garbage. But just that's how it goes."
- Overall benefit/value of consistency in cheap mass produced food and it's contrast with the consistency of expensive luxury food due to it's extreme quality assurance.
Thia: "I posit: tasty foods are of benefit. Except to the animals. And to the people working for slave wages."
Chef: "People gotta eat before they can do anything else. Whatever we can do to make food accessible to everyone, the better. Sure, I'd love to eat well. If you can afford it, great. But you can make great tasting food with the cheap, mass produced stuff. And if that's all you got, then that's all you got. Life is about living, and you can't live without food."
- High barrier of entry to healthy foods, especially fruits, due to high variability in texture, size, taste, etc...
Thia: "I don't know. Mom and dad bought everything. I just went along to memorize the prices of every item in the store."
Chef: "You can find healthy food for cheap. You just gotta know where to look, and how to pick. Worst case: just get some bulk bags of frozen fruits and veggies. They use the ugly stuff, but it's cheaper than fresh and just as nutritious. Maybe even more nutritious, sometimes."
- Ham?
Thia: "I like ham."
Chef: "What about it?"
- Single slice of bread, spread thick layer of catupiry cream cheese, cover in crystal sugar.(Comfort snack)
Thia: "I don't know what kind of cheese that is, but I would still eat it."
Chef: "Sounds good. I used to do something similar with butter and powdered sugar on toast."
- Drinking: pure olive oil, salted vinegar, pure lemon juice.
Thia: "Ew. Maybe the lemon juice."
Chef: "Not my thing, but you do you."
"It removes Clarity."
Q: How many other books will be within the Thiaverse and how similar will they be?
A: I'm not sure how many there will be. I have two stories planned so far and a vague idea of how I want the entire collection to look. They'll all be similar in that certain Words, Concepts, and beings of Divinity will be recurring features throughout. They'll also have a running theme of Overall Benefit, but presented and approached in very different ways. I don't think any of the novels will be quite like Thia in sparseness of presentation (or autistic yuri-ism), but they'll likely be episodic, time skip heavy / non-linear, uniquely flavoured, and featuring some kind of emotional growth on a cosmic scale. Also love, but more in the classical Greek sense, e.g. Pragma, Philia, Philautia, etc. rather than romantic love.
Q: Did It drink water today?
A: It did drink water today. It wonders if Reader drank water today?
Q: If Thia and It are different entities, why are they so similar? If It is so similar to Thia due to the Terms of Being Thia in exchange for Dad's Everything, then why was It different enough from Thia for Dad and Amy to notice so quickly?
A: I'd like to leave this open-ended to the reader, but the two of the most popular ideas I've seen are:
1) Purely coincidence. Over the course of countless epochs and being summoned in myriad realms, such a similarity in mannerisms was statistically bound to happen eventually.
2) It, as an effectively omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent Concept, had mimicked Thia's mannerisms in It's own way to adhere to the Spirit of Law regarding the Term with Dad.
To address the second half of the question: It did not assume the memories of Thia, and It also has It's own mannerisms, which led to the obvious catch for those close to the original while not drawing too much attention from acquaintances. As a thought experiment, imagine if something replaced you and behaved 90% similarly, but lacked the core memories/qualities that bonded you with your loved ones. A coworker, classmate, or casual friend might not notice the change, but those near and dear would probably pick up on some strangeness quite quickly. Especially if you started blinking exactly every 10 seconds, and breathing every 3 seconds to the millisecond.
Q: I wonder, what was the inspiration for Thia's system of ethics, of Just Prices and Overall Benefit?
A: I don't think I can point to a particular source of inspiration other than "wouldn't that be nice?" mixed with a tinge of wish fulfillment. To me, one's word is law, and any promise uttered is a sacred oath that can never be broken without extracting a Price. I understand that many other don't feel this way, but I thought it would be nice if there was a cosmic entity that could bind one to such Terms. In fact, I think it's necessary to have such a Concept when dealing with the scope of the Divinity in this setting. At the highest level, all things are Arbitrated by It, and that is the only way to guarantee that nothing fundamental within the myriad realms, Domains, and those beyond the Veil gets broken.
At a more personal level, to me, how It acts is the embodiment of love. To remember every word one has ever spoken; to adhere to every Term ever made; to never Harm and never allow oneself to be Harmed (read: being Just); and to desire nothing but Overall Benefit for others when possible. I think that It is a model for how everyone should act, and I thought it would be beautiful if others read the story and thought the same.
Q: Did the assorted other friends/classmates figure out that It was a Concept (or, at least, supernatural) eventually, presumably from the events of the wedding? Or did they spend the whole time through that and since up to the end still unaware?
A: "It grants Clarity."
Gabe: "Wait, Thia was actually an alien this whole time?"
Ian: "Mate..."
Chloe: "Gabe... I don't think 'eldritch' means alien..."
Ian: "Like, did you just miss the entire congregation of gods or whatever?"
Gabe: "Wasn't that just costume roleplay?"
Ian: "Mate. You're helpless."
Hayley: "I told you guys the numerology was all wrong. I told you."
Darcy: "You asked me for horns."
Hayley: "..."
Darcy: "..."
Hayley: "Lulu was so hot."
Darcy: "Agree."
Alex: "Agree."
Chloe: "Agree."
Ian: "Agree."
Gabe: "Agree."
Ellie: ("Did somebody mention Lulu?")
Alex: "How did she even hear that from the snack table?"
Ellie: "What'd I miss?"
Ian: "Gabe being an idiot."
Ellie: "Oh. Read a book, Gabe."
Gabe: "Why... You don't even know the context."
Ellie: "Don't need to."
Darcy: "He thinks Thia's an alien."
Ellie: "There. Read a book."
Gabe: "..."
Chloe: "It's okay, Gabe... We know you do learn eventually, even if it takes you a little bit longer than most people."
Gabe: "You guys are the worst."
"It removes Clarity."
Q: Any chance of a paperback release?
A: Yes! I plan to have both the eBook and paperback versions available next year once the ISBNs go through. I'll post an update once everything is ready.
Q: Do you have any books or resources on writing you would recommend?
A: I haven't personally read any books specifically on writing tips/guidelines, but whenever I need to reset and blanche my brain from the influence of other authors' writing styles, I read The Great Storyteller by Lim Han-Baek (임한백). I adore the simple writing style, the sentence structure, and how much vital information is conveyed about a scene in such few words.
To answer the general underlying question, though, what I've done to practice writing is to:
1) Read hundreds (if not thousands) of different books with the intention of learning something from them.
2) Mimic the writing style of said books; rewriting sections to fit my grammatical preferences; fixing sentence flow; noting any clichés or---more importantly---anything that breaks those tropes in interesting ways.
3) Trying to predict the story and comparing what I would do vs. what the author actually does. (Then filing away their solution into the idea bank, because most of the time these authors are brilliant).
4) Taking note of anything that makes me cringe so that I can avoid it in my own writing. Mostly this comes from repetitive sentences structures, cheap clichés, bad dialogue, unrealistic settings and people, idiotification of characters because plot, other contrivances, pacing issues, and so on.
5) Taking note of anything so mind-blowing that I could have never even thought of it, and emulating that in my own writing.
Q: Did anything inspire Thia (Thia the Story, not Little Thia or It)?
A: Thia (the story) came almost entirely from a dream that I had about the initial car crash premise. I sat in bed for hours and wrote about 40 pages of notes immediately after waking up, followed by another 40-ish pages over the next two days with all the various scenes that kept popping into my head. After that initial burst, there were a few blank spots that needed to be filled to make for a coherent-ish story, but overall, Thia basically wrote itself.
And when I say that, I really do mean it. I didn't have a plan at all for how the story would go. Thia was supposed to just be a cute side project that I could channel fluffy, autistic, lesbian energy into as I procrastinated working on my main novel. But the characters were---and still are---so strong in my head that all I had to do was propose situations to them and they would play it through. And eventually... they just kind of made their own story. It was a very organic process. So I guess you could say that (initial dream aside) the inspiration for Thia kind of came from writing Thia. And of course, the general style of weekly comic serials, 4-koma, dialogue-only stories, etc.
Q: In the Epilogue, It states that, until Dad and Amy, "none have sought to treat It as anything more than an Arbitrator or a tool." While, considering Amy's question, you could read that statement exclusively in the context of mortals, I'm curious how It found and experienced friendship among the other Divinities? How does It interpret these relationships? Likewise, how do the other Divinities -- at least those of similar power, such as Lulu, who use the more "informal speech" with It -- interpret this relationship?
A: As seen a few times throughout the story, others mostly dictate the label of It's relationships, and It mostly accepts such labels. E.g., Amy being It's friend, Mom being important to It, Thia being It's sister, etc. Similar patterns follow with any beings of Divinity that It calls 'friend'.
The more powerful beings of Divinity generally have kindly feelings towards It and try their best maintain good relations, but the core of those relationships will always be skewed by It's power as the Concept of Arbitration. In mortal terms, imagine the feelings you might have befriending the Chief Justice, a dean/principal, parent, employer, monarch, etc. Amy's ignorance of the Divine lets her treat It as an adored and admired equal, but those that know the scope of It's power and jurisdiction will inevitably exercise more restraint in their interactions.
Q: Is it ever explained why It has such resistance to being touched?
A: It was never explained, and I'd also like to leave that way, but here are some reader interpretations that I've seen so far:
1) It took on original Thia's quirks;
2) as a largely formless Concept, It is unfamiliar with physical touch;
3) the aversion is a random preference like any other;
4) the aversion is just a running gag
Q: How did dad and mom manage to summon It of all things? It doesn't seem like it personally answers to just anyone's call. Was it because the strong emotions involved? Does it weight importance by emotions?
A: It does, in fact, respond personally to anyone's call. As the Concept of Arbitration, It is omnipresent and impartial. The exception here, rather, is that It was summoned into a mortal body and then offered a Price to remain within that mortal body until dad died. Normally It is formless.
Q: The ritual was said to be amateurish. Also, sacrificing your wife in a ritual to bring back your daughter with no guarantees is unhinged and a random reaction. Maybe something nudged mom and dad that way?
A: Throughout the story, it's been hinted that mom was largely the one responsible for the occult. She was also the one to offer herself as the sacrifice, rather than it being dad who randomly killed her for a chance of Thia's revival.
Chapter 8: "[She] asked dad to use her to bring you back."
Chapter 55: "Mom said that Kitti said that you tied all of our souls together."
Chapter 56: "Confession! I’ve actually kind of been watching you this whole time." [from the afterlife]
"We could all finally be together again as one big happy undead family!”
"Want to see my new necromomicon?"
etc...
So the amateurishness of the ritual came from mom having to direct dad on how to perform this particular summoning ritual + sacrifice.
Q: Given that Amy and It share Everything, can Amy access It's powers, whether in terms of Arbitrating Terms or simply moving around the realms as a Divinity?
A: Yes and no. Amy does not have direct control over any of It's powers, but It will do anything that Amy asks of It, so the distinction is one of language only.
Q: Was It-Thia intended from the beginning to be extremely autism-coded, or did that just end up happening? Either way, I really enjoyed the ‘strange MC telling their strange story in their own strange way’ method of storytelling.
A: Yes! I planned for a large part of the early tension, misunderstandings, and dramatic irony to come from that ambiguity.
"Is this just Thia being Thia? Or..."
Q: I wonder, what does It's domain look like?
A: Much like It, It's Domain would be without form unless such a thing was required.
Q: Did It end up getting a 'real' job after dad passed away?
A: It did not get a 'real' job. Even with dad gone, there is still Overall Benefit for It to not work or accumulate mortal possessions.
Q: Didn't It say that no prices were necessary between those who had exchanged Everything Forever? Why does It keep asking for prices from Amy?
A: No Price is necessary, but that doesn't mean that these interactions can't remain pleasant and playful. Amy or It could force their other half to comply with their Asks, but I imagine making a habit of that would make for a miserable Eternity together. They tend to pick the most kind, respectful, and Overall Beneficial option when given the choice, even when it's not necessary per se.
Q: Will this book be published on Amazon?
A: Yup! Paperback and e-book will both be on Amazon around the end of March. There will be a bonus announcement chapter as soon as everything is ready to go.
>> EDIT: I've been having endless issues with the book designers, so my current best estimate is April/May. Subject to change.
>> EDIT2: Official publishing date is set for June 1st! Look forward to a bonus chapter on release day. In the meantime, pre-orders are available on Amazon or you can get early access to the epub//official paperback pdf
>> EDIT3: Thia is now available on Amazon and all major retailers.
Please keep asking questions :)